thoughts that are informing my thought
to start with: I am currently thinking more about resisting the use of fossil fuels as a form of sensitivity. those that acknowledge the evident damage of the profit driven economic system that props itself up on fossil fuels are those that (broadly) have become sensitive to the non-human.
how can i discuss the protest / resistance of environmental degradation through rendering new sensitivities to their autographic material traces…?
I have currently decided to focus on carbonscapes as a space to critically discuss sensitivity to the climate crisis in light of the backwards step of mining more fossil fuels when their energy use system is deriving us into a eco/genocide.
‘the spaces created by material expressions of carbon-based energy systems and the institutional and cultural practices attached to them’
I was drawn to this site because of the ‘obvious’ nature of fossil fuel = environmentalist trope / collective imaginary to do with ecological intimacy.. the the point where it perhaps sprouts little intimacy… little attainment. how can I in some way subvert this trope and the irony of its counted protest in a way that addresses actors networks and the non-human to human lens…
an extra conflict arises with coal resistance as such movements forms through ‘awkward zones of engagement’
Anna Tsing’s points of ‘friction’ as movements operate under increasingly globalized processes that create ‘zones of awkward engagement’ between chains of different actors at the local, national and international level (Tsing, 2005: xi). Attention to this politics of scale, understanding coal to be embedded within a networked ‘socio-spatial struggle’
these zones may grounded nearer to goals if the locals to the carbonscapes of coal collieries were on board… in the case of the Cumbiran mine, the locals face farce unemployment and hold deep histories with the coal industry so are more likely to no appose plans. A sort of pro extraction place attachment..
These insights have been supplemented by research from the Czech Republic, which demonstrates the significance of place attachment and broader political consciousness as important motives for participants engaging with anti-coal activity (Frantál, 2016)
Resisting coal: Hydrocarbon politics paper
those that protest it are an example of those sensitive – how can I create objects that evolve acts of resistance/protest through the practice of physically sensing. re imagining the material traces of past present and future extraction relationships through evolved objects of resistance …
to do this i would like to investigate how the non-human has visualised its own transition from networked actor within ‘nature’ to become a networked metaphorical actant that is assigned the title of ‘energy’ within natureculture.
‘underground lies a world of ‘natural production,’ the deep-time processes beyond human control that create the hydrocarbon con- centrations we know as fossil fuels…Above-ground and freed from geological fixity, energy is thrown into a tumultuous world of ‘social production’”
Bridge (2009a: 43)
how can I create cartographies of human extraction practices through non-human experience of these practices. how can we become sensitive to and protest against the extraction of coal through a non-human visualisation of its existence.
separate to these maps i would like to discuss sensitivity to these issues through human-non-human sensitivity….
how can the sensitivity of biodiversity become an insight into how humans ‘sense’ the negative assemblage of carbonscapes.